- From: Khushal Sagar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 01:33:09 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thanks for the quick review! > That seems a rather bold claim, considering the [amount of changes](https://www.w3.org/TR/2023/WD-css-view-transitions-1-20230525/#changes-since-2022-11-24). I18n should be the ones deciding that these changes don't introduce any I18n issues, not us. Sure, happy to have the I18n reviewers make that call. Given that this [review](https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/issues/196) is still ongoing, is it reasonable to point to the change list instead of starting a new review? -- GitHub Notification of comment by khushalsagar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8878#issuecomment-1563699154 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 26 May 2023 01:33:11 UTC