- From: Ian Kilpatrick via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 16:21:56 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
To clarify the three options: Option (1) - Keep the spec as is. Note this will require undoing the previous resolution as the current algorithm depends on what the abspos containing block is. *If* the abspos container, is *also* the containing block, pick up the static-position by invoking grid-placement. Option (2) - Use the content-box always. We wouldn't invoke the grid-placement algorithm to pick up the static-position. This option aligns with flex - nothing magical happens. Option (3) - Always invoke grid-placement to acquire the static-position. This would require undoing the resolution in #3020 (as invoking grid-placement for abspos uses the padding-box by default). -- GitHub Notification of comment by bfgeek Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7661#issuecomment-1551707447 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 17 May 2023 16:21:58 UTC