Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Support ViewTransitions for same-origin cross-document navigations (#8804)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-view-transitions-2] Support ViewTransitions for same-origin cross-document navigations`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Extend view transitions to cover cross-doc same-orig navigations`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;bramus> khush: goal of issue is to start working on cross-document support for View Transitions<br>
&lt;bramus> khush: want to walk everyone to overall approach, to later turn in more concrete spec test<br>
&lt;bramus> khush: lot of details need to be sorted out<br>
&lt;bramus> khush: issue contains links to sub issues<br>
&lt;bramus> khush: also want to start an L2 of the spec for this feature, as its a fairly big thing<br>
&lt;bramus> Rossen_: makes sense, can we timebox to 5 minutes?<br>
&lt;bramus> Rossen_: dont want to deep dive in all subissues<br>
&lt;bramus> khush: i’ll try<br>
&lt;bramus> khush: ** goes over issue **<br>
&lt;bramus> khush: ** continues to go over issue **<br>
&lt;bramus> khush: ** still continues to go over issue **<br>
&lt;bramus> khush: ** still continues to go over issue (continued) **<br>
&lt;bramus> khush: that’s it<br>
&lt;bramus> khush: looking for feedback and resolution on L2<br>
&lt;bramus> Rossen_: do you have tag review?<br>
&lt;bramus> khush: yes, for same-document API. dont have explicit tag review for MPA, but want to get rough outline first and then present tag review<br>
&lt;bramus> Rossen_: please start tag review ASAP. is going to have a lot of discussion<br>
&lt;bramus> Rossen_: lots of security/privacy concerns will most likely arise<br>
&lt;bramus> Rossen_: you don’t need an ED, only an explainer<br>
&lt;bramus> khush: we are not targetting for cross-origin navs. explainer will make that explicit<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> Lot of details to nail down, but I'm very happy with th einitial work.<br>
&lt;bramus> Rossen_: any reasons not to continue this proposed outline?<br>
&lt;bramus> Rossen_: this is only a beginning<br>
&lt;bramus> Rossen_: any objections to cover cross-doc same-orig navs?<br>
&lt;bramus> Pro: Extend view transitions to cover cross-doc same-orig navigations<br>
&lt;bramus> RESOLVED: Extend view transitions to cover cross-doc same-orig navigations<br>
&lt;bramus> Rossen_: maybe in L1, though?<br>
&lt;Rossen_> ack fantasai<br>
&lt;bramus> khush: ** asks details on L1/L2 distinction **<br>
&lt;bramus> fantasai: ** spills the details **<br>
&lt;bramus> s/distinction/distinction and CR process/<br>
&lt;bramus> khush: thanks<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8804#issuecomment-1542525679 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2023 16:54:59 UTC