- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 07:06:13 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thanks. I did not think to look at the Web IDL spec for `readonly`. So it would be different. I assume that making this change this way reduced its impact in terms of backwards compatibility. I am not requesting a change to `readonly`. I was mostly interested in why implementing a setter that returns nothing is required instead, so I am closing as this question has been answered. -- GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8778#issuecomment-1530987593 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2023 07:06:15 UTC