- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 19:31:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Logical `background-position` syntax was resolved on many years ago (it's complicated because it can be a mix of logical and physical), and I believe @SebastianZ has edited that proposal into the css-backgrounds-4 ED. The logical values for `background-position` and the logical properties `background-position-inline` and `background-position-block` were actually [added to the spec. many years ago](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/bd486876f803c52e90d5cfbab258aba14ed95ad7) by you, @fantasai. 😃 My contribution to that is only to improve the values for the `background-position` shorthand and that discussion is still ongoing in #549. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8665#issuecomment-1492491265 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 31 March 2023 19:31:51 UTC