- From: Sam Atkins via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 15:09:16 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
AtkinsSJ has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-values-4] Recursive math functions are inconsistently specified == The spec about math functions is a bit inconsistent, at least from what I can tell. Each math function is described as allowing a `calculation` for its parameters, but that links specifically to the `calc()` definition, whereas the examples show that other math functions are allowed there. The [syntax description](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#calc-syntax) does not itself allow any function (including `calc()`) to appear as a parameter to another math function. So the issues here are: - The syntax should allow for math functions as part of `<calc-value>`. - The places that currently link to `calculation` should link elsewhere. The usage of `calculation` includes literal numbers or values, and math functions, as well as calc-like expressions. (Which generally corresponds to `<calc-value>`.) Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8664 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 31 March 2023 15:09:18 UTC