- From: jfkthame via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 10:01:37 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I didn't have a particularly great reason to define it that way, except that it seemed simpler at the time. To me, it seems confusing rather than simpler. If the range of a `@counter-style` rule excludes the value being represented, its `fallback` applies. `fallback` references another counter style. It's unnatural to expect it to reference only certain aspects of the fallback style and not the style as a whole. > Happy to adjust things if browsers prefer to align these things. Given the lack of clear motivation for the "partial-fallback" interpretation, and that we received a specific bug report (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1808995) relating to this (with a real-world use case), I think we should indeed adjust this. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jfkthame Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8619#issuecomment-1491665505 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 31 March 2023 10:01:39 UTC