- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:25:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Yes, this is just to avoid switching between polar and rectangular coordinates. Its a nice optimization and gives the same result. > Separately, the term "analytical" should be avoided. I Agreed, it was not a good choice. I guess I meant "geometrically" ie the intersection of a line and a polyhedron. > The idea of adding an extra step to solutions that arrive at the exact solution "too quickly" seems inappropriate and indicative of deeper problems. No, its an awareness of a problem, which is fairly well known in the gamut mapping literature, caused by shallow and concave gamut boundaries. Instead of intersecting a (zero-width) line with the boundary, we actually want to intersect a (0.5 JND radius) cylinder. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7653#issuecomment-1489096489 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2023 18:25:51 UTC