- From: Brandon McConnell via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 18:26:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@Crissov I really like that idea. We can certainly bikeshed on the name a bit more. I like the `::content` name a lot too, as long as it won't confuse users between the `content` property and the `::content` pseudo-element, but as you pointed out, I think that they could actually work well together. In that case, keeping the name the same would be ideal. -- GitHub Notification of comment by brandonmcconnell Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8634#issuecomment-1484180279 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 26 March 2023 18:26:51 UTC