- From: Romain Menke via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 21:42:27 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@LeaVerou > I’m not sure what future you are reacting so strongly against. I didn't think I was reacting overly strong here. Written communication for non-native english speakers can lack nuance. If I didn't express myself correctly, then I apologize, this was not my intention. > I will remind you that we have a WG resolution and I personally will not engage in this further. I don't think it is helpful or welcoming if the slightest friction escalates like this. I hope we can keep this conversation open to feedback? ------ My only concern here is that backwards compat is given sufficient weight here given the small gains of this change. Authors only need to type two words to opt-in. To me it felt as if backwards compat wasn't given enough weight. But as that the next step is to research exactly that, then I think there is no issue here :) -- GitHub Notification of comment by romainmenke Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7948#issuecomment-1481951652 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2023 21:42:29 UTC