- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 20:44:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Given the above definition, please correct me if the following expectation is wrong I think so? @flackr @emilio, is this what you expect? > One slight question - none only interrupts CSS animations, so I think we only need to modify none values in animations with an [owning element](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-animations-2/#owning-element). I'm not sure what you're trying to optimize here. Does an animation have any observable effect if it doesn't have an owning element? > Yeah we should probably do the same with content as it has exactly the same sort of problem and currently has 3 completely different behaviors across browsers. Filed https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8623 -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6429#issuecomment-1476907109 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 20 March 2023 20:44:02 UTC