Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations-1] Timeline lookup should probably not use flat tree (#8192)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[scroll-animations-1] Timeline lookup should probably not use flat tree`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: SLA does do flat-tree lookup for nearest ancestor scroller, spec will be clarified`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: My position on container queries doesn't apply here, I agree with fantasai<br>
&lt;fantasai> s/Topic/Subtopic/<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> ydaniv: AGreed, but one concern<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> ydaniv: "nearest" is taking your lookup - you might think youw ere inactive but end up in an active timeline<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> flackr: I think that's consistent with other scroller APIs, like stickypos<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: So proposing to resolve we do use the flat tree to find nearest scroller<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> flackr: yup<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> astearns: so where the spec currently says "nearest ancestor" we make it explicit to be flat tree<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> RESOLVED: SLA does do flat-tree lookup for nearest ancestor scroller, spec will be clarified<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8192#issuecomment-1476498760 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 20 March 2023 15:56:46 UTC