- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2023 00:49:17 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Iterating on my previous suggestion, if we align the syntax with the current definition of `<position>` and still allow the three-value syntax, this could be ```ebnf <bg-position> = [ [ left | center | right | inline-start | inline-end ] || [ top | center | bottom | block-start | block-end ] | [ left | center | right | inline-start | inline-end | <length-percentage> ] [ top | center | bottom | block-start | block-end <length-percentage> ]? | [ [ left | right | inline-start | inline-end ] <length-percentage>? ] && [ [ top | bottom | block-start | block-end ] <length-percentage>? ] ] ``` In addition to that we might still have `start` and `end` as keywords, though then being shorthands for `inline-start` and `block-start` resp. `inline-end` and `block-end`. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/549#issuecomment-1475052033 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 19 March 2023 00:49:19 UTC