- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 20:08:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> > And it still plays well with border-radius. > Yeah, I'm not convinced that's an advantage :) > > E.g. it could be specified that only values without vertical radii (i.e. without the values after the slash) are applied. > > Note that you can get elliptical radii with a single `border-radius` value, if it's a percentage. Right, elliptical radii probably aren't expected in combination with bevels or other corner shapes. So giving this a little more thought, I now tend to agree with you that it might be better to introduce a separate property for that. It's also be better in regard of implementations because it could be handled separately. > > @LeaVerou Are the transitions between borders the reason implementers are reluctant to implement corner shapes? Or is it the missing specification regarding those transitions in Level 4? Or is it something else? > > You would need to ask implementers :) @tabatkins, @smfr, @emilio What needs to happen to get some attention for this feature? Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8591#issuecomment-1474975977 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 18 March 2023 20:08:27 UTC