- From: Matthew Phillips via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 15:43:24 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thank you @DarkWiiPlayer and @keithjgrant if this proposal is targeting hand-written CSS then it starts to make more sense to me. @keithjgrant with your analogy to BEM, this proposal gets rid of the need for the Element and Modifier, but not for the Block, if I'm understanding correctly. Which means you still might use tooling to produce a unique Block name. Or you might use naming conventions to ensure there are no conflicting block names. -- GitHub Notification of comment by matthewp Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6790#issuecomment-1472225175 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2023 15:43:26 UTC