- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:36:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@AmeliaBR > This seems like a lot of added complexity for a fairly niche style. I disagree that it is niche. Perhaps actual beveled corners are niche, but the kinds of polygons one can create with this are all over the web. https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6980 has several use cases. > So, my suggestion would be ... It looks like this is basically my earlier [`element-shape` proposal](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6980#issuecomment-1020301916). The problem with all of these is that it is very difficult to define all the border edge cases, `border-radius` has been a huge pain for this reason and nobody wants to do this work for arbitrary shapes. This is *exactly* why there is no implementor interest for `corner-shape`, and your proposal makes the problem even harder, not easier. Furthermore, this doesn't really cover the extremely common case of a polygon with rounded angles, unless you are willing to spell the path out with (pretty lengthy, and inflexible) SVG, at which point you may as well have been using an image. And, as you point out, even for simple shapes, the syntax can get complicated fast. -- GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8591#issuecomment-1470982240 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2023 23:36:20 UTC