- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:23:04 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
cdoublev has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-values-4] Allow omitting `<declaration-value>` in `mix()` == If I am not mistaken, [`mix()`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#funcdef-mix) is valid for custom properties, whose initial value is the guaranteed-invalid value, ie. an omitted value. > A `mix()` notation is invalid if either of its `<declaration-value>`s are invalid when interpreted as a whole value for the property the function is used in, or if the property using it is not animatable. Should `mix()` syntax allow omitting `<declaration-value>` ... ```diff - <mix()> = mix( <percentage> ';' <declaration-value> ';' <declaration-value> ) + <mix()> = mix( <percentage> ';' <declaration-value>? ';' <declaration-value>? ) ``` ... to accept inputs like `--custom: mix(50%; ; on)`? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8556 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 10 March 2023 14:23:06 UTC