- From: Chris Rebert via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 10:02:35 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
cvrebert has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-cascade][css-cascade-6] "source order" terminology regression == https://drafts.csswg.org/css-cascade-6/#scope-effects This spec uses the term "source order" 3 times: once normatively, once in an example, and once in an inline Issue. These usages appear to be in prose for feature(s) newly added in Level 6. As established in #6839, the term "source order" is undefined. [Order of appearance](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-cascade-6/#cascade-order) should be preferred instead, since it does have a formal definition. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8550 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2023 10:02:37 UTC