Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes-1] Define equivalent paths (#8524)

My concern is that the spec drifted out of date pretty readily - we were missing the new rect functions, and won't mention shape() (but that's probably handwaveable, since it's just an alternate version of path()).

But I could be okay with moving these to a normative appendix, with a note that anything missing from the Shapes spec is an error and that this might move to that spec later.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8524#issuecomment-1456750007 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 6 March 2023 18:44:28 UTC