- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2023 23:36:20 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@tabatkins The contents are not directly "in the top layer" or these would apply: https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/#new-stacking-layer > Each element and [::backdrop](https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/#css-pe-backdrop) pseudo-element in a [top layer](https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/#top-layer) has the following characteristics: [lots of things that don't happen] https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/#::backdrop-pseudo-element > Each element in a [top layer](https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/#top-layer) has a ::backdrop pseudo-element. Basically, the cases are: 1. Element with `content-visibility: auto` has contents in the top layer. These contents would be reparented and escape containment, so it can be observable whether they are skipped or not. So we don't want to skip contents. 2. Element with `content-visibility: auto` is itself in the top layer. Such thing has a `::backdrop` content in the top layer, so this actually fits into the previous case. 3. Element with `content-visibility: auto` has ancestors in the top layer. I see no need to prevent skipping its contents. The spec covers cases 1 and 2. The test is for case 3. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8514#issuecomment-1451031506 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2023 23:36:22 UTC