- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2023 17:28:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-cascade-6] The specificity of a scope rule`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: the specificity of the scope root is not applied to selectors from scoped rules` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <fremy> miriam: in the current spec, the specificity of scope works very much like nesting<br> <fremy> miriam: in that the scope selector gives its specificity to all selectors inside<br> <fremy> miriam: this seems split 50/50 between people<br> <fremy> miriam: but this sounds like an accidental side effect that is not necessary<br> <fremy> miriam: so, we should probably not apply it<br> <TabAtkins> +1<br> <bramus> q+<br> <fantasai> +1<br> <ydaniv> +1<br> <fremy> +1<br> <astearns> ack bramus<br> <TabAtkins> the thread definintely didn't seem 50/50, but it might be more evenly split in general ^_^<br> <fremy> bramus: in the thread, I added some doubts, but in the end I agree<br> <fremy> fantasai: and if you want the other behavior, you can use ampersand<br> <fremy> miriam: yes, ampersand would work<br> <fremy> astearns: easier than designing an opt-out<br> <fremy> astearns: ok, can we get a short summary of the resolution?<br> <fremy> miriam: the specificity of the scope root is not applied to selectors from scoped rules<br> <fremy> astearns: any objection?<br> <fremy> RESOLVED: the specificity of the scope root is not applied to selectors from scoped rules<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8500#issuecomment-1450547792 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2023 17:28:10 UTC