Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-animations-2] Should the initial value for animation-duration be auto? (#6530)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-animations-2] Should the initial value for animation-duration be auto?`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Go with option 2, "check for only the initial value (one list item, being auto)"`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;drott> fantasai: We changed animation-duration initial value to auto<br>
&lt;drott> fantasai: But we need that to return 0 seconds for time based animations<br>
&lt;drott> fantasai: someone? wanted to clarify when that triggers<br>
&lt;fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/8952<br>
&lt;drott> fanatasai: drafted a PR for that (triggers when animation timeline is at 0(<br>
&lt;drott> fantasai: if there is only one list value, and that computed value is auto<br>
&lt;Rossen_> q?<br>
&lt;flackr> q+<br>
&lt;drott> fantasai: wanted to confirm with the working group - is the draft suitable? Which version do we want to go with?<br>
&lt;Rossen_> ack flackr<br>
&lt;fantasai> fantasai: alternative is to allow multiple values, but all of them need to be auto<br>
&lt;drott> flackr: the significant use case is: initial value of animation timeline should be covered<br>
&lt;drott> flackr: proposed PR is good in that regard, unless developer changes animation timeline<br>
&lt;drott> flackr: reason we didn't want to expose multiple values was: didn't want to expose the duration (?)<br>
&lt;flackr> s/?/duration repeat behavior<br>
&lt;drott> rossen_: any reasons for concern?<br>
&lt;drott> rossen_: proposal to stick with single value?<br>
&lt;fantasai> Options were:<br>
&lt;fantasai> 1. auto values individually convert to 0s, can have a mixed list<br>
&lt;fantasai> 2. check for only the initial value (one list item, being auto)<br>
&lt;fantasai> 3. check for the entire list being auto (but multiple values ok)<br>
&lt;drott> rossen_: no objections heard to go with single value?<br>
&lt;drott> rossen_: based on that clarification, anyone changed their mind?<br>
&lt;drott> RESOLVED: Go with option 2, "check for only the initial value (one list item, being auto)"<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6530#issuecomment-1611724674 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2023 16:16:35 UTC