- From: Rune Lillesveen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:22:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I think we've settled on a proposal here, in two parts (see [#7551 (comment)](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7551#issuecomment-1398727361)): > > * No container is considered 'valid' for unknown query features (`general-enclosed`) > * Add a comma-separated syntax for multiple queries that each find their own container. The results are combined using 'or' logic. > > But I would like to get a bit more implementor confirmation here that: > > * this is an acceptable approach I think so. The consequence of that is that we no longer need the kleene logic for container queries, right? > * we don't need a use-counter at this point I'm about to add one for Blink: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4654704 > /cc @lilles @anttijk @emilio Sorry about the late response. -- GitHub Notification of comment by lilles Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7551#issuecomment-1611641290 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2023 15:22:03 UTC