- From: Robert Flack via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 21:27:56 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Based on the poll in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8857#issuecomment-1591335579 and the various discussions about terms for the value the proposed resolution is: Add the longhand property name `transition-animation-type` with the list of values `normal` and `animatable` (associated with the list of transitions), with an initial value of `normal` for compatibility. Adjustment to the transitionable behavior defined at https://www.w3.org/TR/css-transitions-1/#transitionable: `normal`: property values are transitionable if they have an [animation type](https://drafts.csswg.org/web-animations-1/#animation-type) that is neither [not animatable](https://drafts.csswg.org/web-animations-1/#not-animatable) nor [discrete](https://drafts.csswg.org/web-animations-1/#discrete). (Current legacy behavior) `animatable`: property values are transitionable if they have an [animation type](https://drafts.csswg.org/web-animations-1/#animation-type) that is not [not animatable](https://drafts.csswg.org/web-animations-1/#not-animatable). -- GitHub Notification of comment by flackr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8857#issuecomment-1608287805 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 26 June 2023 21:27:58 UTC