- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:52:43 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> > `@allow-view-transitions: same-document` would be the default, and `@allow-view-transitions: none` would be equivalent to `::view-transitions { display: none }`.
>
>
>
> Bearing in mind that `::view-transitions { display: none }` only hides transitions, it doesn't prevent them, do you really mean that?
It skips the animation, doesn't just hide it.
>
>
>
> > ```css
>
> > @auto-view-transitions {
>
> > same-origin: allow;
>
> > same-site: allow;
>
> > same-document: allow;
>
> > }
>
> > ```
>
> >
>
> > or something like:
>
> >
>
> > ```css
>
> > @auto-view-transitions: same-origin same-document same-site;
>
> > ```
>
>
>
> This feels generally in the right direction. CSSWG folks who are across multiple specs will be able to help with the naming & syntax.
>
>
>
> It might be worth thinking about what a 'manual' cross-document view transition would look like. As in, some kind of just-in-time opt-in. And, whether this syntax makes sense in that case, particularly in the new page that drives the animation.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by noamr
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8048#issuecomment-1586880009 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 12 June 2023 08:52:44 UTC