- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2023 22:07:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
My vote goes for `transition-type: [ normal | animatable ]#` for the reason [mentioned](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8857#issuecomment-1580890102) by @flackr and because the names are short and easy to spell. I'm leaning a little bit more to `-type` than `-mode` for the property name because it is more common, though I don't have a strong preference between those two. The other two suggested names are unnecessarily long. Regarding the values, `interpolable` might be a little bit hard to spell as it could be mixed with `interpolatable`. On the other hand, it might not be immediately clear to everyone that `normal` means that discrete transitions are excluded. I still lean towards that as it's used in other places, it's easy to spell and it's meaning (as initial value) needs to be learned anyway. For including discrete transitions, I think `animatable` is the way to go, as `discrete` may confuse people whether it makes transitions of interpolable values also discrete. I didn't consider any other names yet, so maybe there are even better ones. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8939#issuecomment-1583452849 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2023 22:07:28 UTC