Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] `anchor()` inside an `inset` shorthand (#8582)

Okay yes, you're right, I should separate out the "automatically choose a side" behavior (can be done regardless) and the "automatically add fallback" behavior (needs the other side to be auto).

Then you should be able to say `inset: anchor(auto-same);` and have it be the same as `top: anchor(top); right: anchor(right); left: anchor(left); bottom: anchor(bottom);`.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8582#issuecomment-1579441961 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2023 20:58:05 UTC