- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:14:04 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
It was specifically pointed out (by @fantasai ) [during the intent to ship](https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/f5eLz6PIXaI/m/tUoCPTkXAQAJ?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer) that: > my concerns are mainly with: > […] > c) whether the CSSWG considers this stable enough to ship, or if there are unresolved concerns about the design of the feature @kojiishi 's answer was: > I understand that the spec is still in early draft, it’s WD, not CR, PR, nor REC. If the spec changes, we can change our implementation accordingly. Even if names were changed or the feature was dropped, not applying `text-wrap: balance` doesn’t cause disasters; it just lays out the same as other browsers So, while we should not change just for the sake of changing, if there are good reasons to change, my understanding is that Chrome has indicated that this is a risk they were willing to take when shipping early. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9102#issuecomment-1649927288 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2023 14:14:06 UTC