- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:51:16 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Since "lines" is plural in this part of the spec, > (including lines that end in a forced break) I think the intended meaning is that you balance the whole block as one thing, across forced line breaks. Otherwise, for each sub-block, you'd only be taking into account one "line that ends in a forced break" at a time. But I don't think it would hurt to be explicit if that is what we mean. On the other hand, if the difference in layout is minimal in most cases, maybe it's worth defining it the other way around, or at least allowing UAs to treat each sub-block separately, as that should have better performance characteristics. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9112#issuecomment-1649887728 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2023 13:51:18 UTC