- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 14:47:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I would like to point out that the CSSWG [has already resolved](https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3s4CzEEENXEUSkSuHo_jBhBNrh23DRZa42heqPOAW4RDA@mail.gmail.com) to add `inherit()` to css-values-5. I think the Agenda+ is just for @LeaVerou’s suggestion that we [start by limiting it to custom properties](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2864#issuecomment-1408740179) because their computed value serialization is already fully defined. Indeed. There is also the option of limiting it to custom properties PLUS an allowlist of properties with fully defined computed value serialization, such as `background-color`, `font-size`, or `font-weight` (these are not random, they come from use cases mentioned here. It may also be nice to settle on a name. The ones proposed are: - `parent()` - `parent-var()` - `inherit()` - `inherited()` - `ancestor()` - `closest()` (feel free to edit the list if I missed some) I think we largely have consensus for `parent()`, so it would be nice to have a resolution. -- GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2864#issuecomment-1645708854 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 21 July 2023 14:47:03 UTC