- From: Jake Archibald via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:56:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
jakearchibald has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-images] object-fit values per axis == While playing with view transitions, I felt like we need some new object-fit values. Let's say the old view of a transition is: ``` [Hello] ``` And the new view is: ``` [everybody in the world] ``` (for folks unfamiliar with view transitions, they're two images that cross-fade, while transitioning width and height from the 'old' values to the 'new') The effect I want is the for text to be centred as it cross-fades, and clip content outside the bounds. I can achieve that today like this: ```css ::view-transition-old(the-text) { overflow: hidden; object-fit: contain; } ::view-transition-new(the-text) { overflow: hidden; object-fit: cover; } ``` The reason I use `contain` on the 'old' view, and `cover` on the 'new' view, is because the new view is wider than the old view. If I want to run the transition the other way around, I'd need to swap `cover` and `contain`. What it actually feels like I want to say is: Contain on the y-axis only. Allow it to overflow on the x-axis. That rule works no matter what size the content is. It would also work when transitioning from a 4:3 thumbnail to a 16:9 image. So, `contain-x` and `contain-y`? (cc @noamr @khushalsagar) Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9066 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 14 July 2023 11:56:35 UTC