Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] [css-color-5] inconsistent mentions of powerless components in `white`. (#8609)

> So none for chroma still doesn't quite make sense, not for white or gray, at least not in my mind.

If this is still in response to `(equivalent of oklch(100% none none))`, please ignore that. As I said, it was poorly stated. I've edited my question, hopefully to prevent further confusion.

------

Because `chroma` doesn't become powerless in the latest specification text the results are a little bit different, but mixing blue and white still gives a shade of blue, not redish/greenish 🎉 

```css
.foo {
 color-1: rgb(174, 138, 255); /* fallback */
 color-1: color(display-p3 0.66273 0.5437 0.98509); /* fallback */
 color-1: color-mix(in lch, white, blue); /* input */
}

.foo {
 color-2: rgb(119, 163, 255);
 color-2: color(display-p3 0.49508 0.63377 1);
 color-2: color-mix(in oklch, white, blue);
}

.foo {
 color-3: rgb(128, 128, 255);
 color-3: color-mix(in srgb, white, blue);
}
```

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by romainmenke
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8609#issuecomment-1624933647 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 7 July 2023 07:49:12 UTC