- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2023 21:05:30 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yeah, reviewing the diff I'm almost certain it was just a mistake while writing it - it *looked* reasonable to use an `&&` in the grammar while I was rewriting. I still think it's probably reasonable to do so, but nobody's followed that in forever and it's not very important, so reverting to the old spec text which matches impls makes sense. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/8021#issuecomment-1622510355 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 5 July 2023 21:05:32 UTC