- From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2023 08:31:04 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
andruud has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:
== [css-cascade-6] :scope and featureless elements ==
- With `@scope (:host)`, you can make the shadow host a scoping root.
- Since `:scope` is defined to match the scoping root, it would then be able to match that element, even if it's featureless.
_Or would it?_
Selectors:
> A [featureless](https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors/#featureless) element does not match any selector at all, except those it is **explicitly** defined to match (and [logical combination pseudo-classes](https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors/#logical-combination-pseudo-classes) representing those selectors).
Specs _appear_ to be saying that `@scope (:host) { :scope { ... } }` would match, except that they aren't **explicitly** saying this.
Should we state this explicitly?
@mirisuzanne @tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9025 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 3 July 2023 08:31:08 UTC