- From: Alan Stearns via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 22:34:42 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
One of the claims I have heard is that we can ship option 3 now, then in a lookahead future we can update nesting syntax. Could someone elaborate on what that update would look like? I am also interested in exploring the suggestion from @bramus about shipping a subset of option 3 with a required & to start, then gradually adding more functionality over time. That seems like a promising compromise, though it would likely make the `@supports` story much more complicated -- GitHub Notification of comment by astearns Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8249#issuecomment-1396182537 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2023 22:34:43 UTC