- From: Steinar H. Gunderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:48:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> The current implementation desugars with `:is()` (per spec) so it is not an issue at the moment.
Won't it still be?
```
.a, .b, .c, .d {
& &, & &, & &, & & {
& &, & &, & &, & & {
& &, & &, & &, & & {
& &, & &, & &, & & {
color: red;
}
}
}
}
}
```
If you desugar, you'd end up with exponential :is() lists and thus RAM usage, right?
--
GitHub Notification of comment by sesse
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8310#issuecomment-1386927132 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2023 11:48:59 UTC