- From: Quentin Albert via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:42:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Right, but you can do it with two properties right now. I get that you're suggesting that it's one property, but it's also a whole new layout system to learn. Although, if you're saying behaves exactly like a 1x1 grid, then it seems like leaving the definition as a 1x1 grid is better than creating an alias for that? As mentioned in the comment above yours, building that with a grid is pretty error prone. One could easily break the wanted behaviour. There is no way to ensure that the grid will always have a single row and column. From the idea how it's currently implemented it should work similar to a 1x1 grid to prevent having to learn a while new layout system. But from the general conditions and error boundaries it should work different. E.g. there shouldn't be the possibility to position the elements inside on some kind of grid or anything. So `grid-row`, `grid-column` .... -- GitHub Notification of comment by Que-tin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8321#issuecomment-1385622570 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2023 15:42:33 UTC