- From: Jake Archibald via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:01:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm not against `view-transition-name` causing an element to become a stacking context. I think developers are pretty used to that given the number of other properties that result in the same behaviour. @khushalsagar > 1. If an element has a non-none computed value for `view-transition-name`, then `isolation` computed to `isolate`. I don't know if you meant this literally, but I don't think it should work literally like this. That isn't how it works with `opacity` etc https://jsbin.com/xuyekeh/edit?css,js,console,output @vmpstr > To add to this, I think elements participating in a view transition should have `trasform-style: flat` I don't fully get the reasons for this, but I don't mind that being a restriction. It's something we can revisit later if needed. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jakearchibald Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8139#issuecomment-1385469903 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2023 14:01:02 UTC