- From: Jake Archibald via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 13:43:23 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Results of the [mini-poll](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8310#issuecomment-1384064828):
There was only ~350 votes per poll on Twitter, and ~150 on Mastodon. Mostly limited to folks who follow me.
Folks were pretty divided when it came to:
```css
.a .b {
.c + & {
background: green;
}
}
```
Twitter:
- `.c + :is(.a .b)` 45%
- `.c + .a .b` 40%
Mastodon:
- `.c + :is(.a .b)` 36%
- `.c + .a .b` 48%
Note: I didn't present these selectors as options. Instead I [described the behaviour](https://twitter.com/jaffathecake/status/1614976570996756480).
There was a stronger preference when it came to:
```css
.a .b {
.c & {
background: green;
}
}
```
Twitter:
- `.c :is(.a .b)` 33%
- `.c .a .b` 48%
Mastodon:
- `.c :is(.a .b)` 18%
- `.c .a .b` 47%
--
GitHub Notification of comment by jakearchibald
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8310#issuecomment-1385443826 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2023 13:43:25 UTC