Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting-1] & representing parent elements vs parent selector (#8310) from Brad Kemper via GitHub on 2023-01-16 (public-css-archive@w3.org from January 2023)

From: Brad Kemper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 17:13:29 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-1384346158-1673889207-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

> Probably matches author intuition worse when used with the sibling combinators like in .a .b { .c + & {...}}, where it produces .c + .a .b. 

I've been using SASS significantly for only a year or two, and this did and does match my intuition. I think it is a LOT easier to understand than the implicit `:is(&)` version, which would select things I hadn't really considered. 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by bradkemper
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8310#issuecomment-1384346158 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 16 January 2023 17:13:31 UTC