- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 17:47:31 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
cdoublev has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-cascade-5] Define `<layer-name>` with `<custom-ident>` instead of `<ident>` == Is there a reason to use `<ident>` instead of `<custom-ident>` to define [`<layer-name>`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-cascade-5/#typedef-layer-name)? Is it to allow `default`? > `<layer-name> = <ident> [ '.' <ident> ]*` > > The CSS-wide keywords are reserved for future use, and cause the rule to be invalid at parse time if used as an <ident> in the <layer-name>. https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#custom-idents > `<custom-ident>` [...] represents any valid CSS identifier that would not be misinterpreted as a pre-defined keyword in that property’s value definition. [...] The CSS-wide keywords are not valid `<custom-ident>`s. The `default` keyword is reserved and is also not a valid `<custom-ident>`. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8287 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 7 January 2023 17:47:33 UTC