- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:24:40 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Note that `a.active:nth-prev-sibling(1)` matches a subset of `a.active`, so presumably it would be equivalent to `a.active:has(+ *)`. 1 element before `a.active` could be `:nth-prev-sibling(1 of a.active)` (but then the meaning of the selector argument is different than in `:nth-child`, the full functionality would maybe need two selectors?) -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8483#issuecomment-1441885602 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2023 14:24:42 UTC