- From: pes10k via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 16:53:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
pes10k has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == Nit: the text describing the group pseudo-element name is confusing [css-view-transitions-1] == This is is from the recently requested [PING privacy review](https://github.com/w3cping/privacy-request/issues/107). Its not identifying a privacy issue, not intended to be blocking, and only being offered as a friendly suggestion for where the text in the spec might be clarified. Currently [Section 2](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-view-transitions-1/#transitions-as-enhancements) of the spec describes each collection of the four pseudo elements as a group, with the first element consisting of the group: ``` Each of the groups is comprised of up to four pseudo elements: 1. Group… ``` It took me a few reads to make sure this wasn't a typo, and to make sure I understood what was going on in the text. Having the first element of the group be a thing called "group" seems likely to cause unnecessary confusion. I imagine changing the names of the psudo-elements would be painful at this point, so as a straw suggestion, what if "Each ~of the groups~ **view transition target** is comprised of up to four pseudo elements…" Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8486 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2023 16:53:48 UTC