- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 00:12:12 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
SebastianZ has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-backgrounds-4] Order of keywords in `border-*-radius` shorthands == Currently, the order of the `border-*-radius` shorthand values is defined as top to bottom and left to right for the physical properties and start to end for the logical properties. Though @Loirooriol [questioned this](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/7705/files#r985108445) and proposed to rather follow the clockwise order used for the `border-radius` shorthand. So `border-radius: 1px 2px 3px 4px` would be equivalent to ```css border-top-radius: 1px 2px; border-bottom-radius: 3px 4px; ``` instead of ```css border-top-radius: 1px 2px; border-bottom-radius: 4px 3px; ``` The question is, do authors rather expect opposite sides to always follow one direction or have a clockwise order? This question similarily applies to the logical shorthands. Should they always be start to end or should they map differently? I tend to say one direction, though it also goes against `border-radius`. Sebastian Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8469 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2023 00:12:14 UTC