- From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 00:46:52 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@mirisuzanne Please have a look. I felt that I had to reorganize a bit here to make a natural place for "implicit" scopes to live. Description of changes: - A scope should probably have a _single_ scoping root. However: - A single `@scope` rule can produce multiple (explicit) scopes. Or a single implicit scope. - Removed the circular or near-circular sentence "selectors are scoped to the given scope, with the :scope element being the scoping root" which Emilio complained about at some point (somewhere). - Avoid selector-4's definition of "scoped" for now, because it does not clarify what it means by "descendant", and does not account for scoping limits. - Beautify the grammar part of the spec. Hopefully it's more or less to your liking. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andruud Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/8463#issuecomment-1433937020 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 17 February 2023 00:46:54 UTC