- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:02:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-overflow-4] overflow-clip-margin longhands`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Go with (2) for now` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <emilio> fantasai: question is how does the shorthand looks like<br> <emilio> ... one is to use different delimiter as grid<br> <emilio> ... another is to have box then up to four lengths<br> <emilio> ... then /missed/<br> <TabAtkins> I support option 2 (single box keyword, 1-4 lengths)<br> <emilio> ... oriol proposed 1-to-4 lengths-and-box<br> <emilio> fantasai: I prefer oriol proposal, then (2)<br> <emilio> TabAtkins: seems to be the one that matches up most cleanly what people want to do<br> <emilio> ... single kw and multiple length addresses most cases<br> <emilio> fantasai: (4) allows you to do one kw but also multiple<br> <emilio> ... full expansion might be unusual but you don't have to use it<br> <emilio> ... and it allows all of them<br> <emilio> astearns: all combinations are allowed in the longhands<br> <emilio> astearns: oriol, are you ok with (2) or wanna argue for (4)<br> <emilio> oriol: no strong opinion, would be fine with (2) or even just restricting to 1kw + length<br> <emilio> proposal is to start with one keyword, we can always expand if needed<br> <emilio> RESOLVED: Go with (2) for now<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8381#issuecomment-1431691856 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2023 17:02:48 UTC