Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] More declarative syntax for simple cases (#7757)

> Are you suggesting that using auto in both base style with a position fallback doesn't make much sense?

Per [your earlier comment](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7757#issuecomment-1412872476), base styles are ignored when using position fallback, so I'm matching that behavior.

> So how about making the restriction even stronger: if the base style has anchor(auto) and uses position fallback (see example below), then the anchor(auto) in the base style doesn't expand into any @try rule.

That's what the current spec already does.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7757#issuecomment-1426247641 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 10 February 2023 19:32:30 UTC