- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 04:11:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The trouble is that the [official definition](https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css-2023/#css-official) has a normative ref to CSS Fonts 3 (which is a Rec) while CSS Fonts 4, which is indeed a stable replacement and current work, and current implementation target, is nit a CR and is just an informative reference from [rough interop](https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css-2023/#rough-interop). -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8432#issuecomment-1425150139 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 10 February 2023 04:11:51 UTC