- From: Jake Archibald via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2023 10:14:09 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@fantasai @tabatkins I need a bit of advice for speccing this. It seems like there isn't consistency when it comes to _where_ to define this. The choices are: - Option 1: Along with the `view-transition-name` definition (eg "setting this make the element a stacking context") - Option 2: Along with the layout concept (eg "the following properties are grouping property values… `view-transition-name`) Taking `opacity` as an example: - Stacking context: [option 1](https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css-color/#ref-for-TermStackingContext) - Grouping element: [option 2](https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css-transforms-2/#ref-for-propdef-opacity) - Backdrop root: [option 2](https://drafts.fxtf.org/filter-effects-2/#backdrop-root) Or, should I just do the same as opacity here, and do both options depending on the effect? In cases I do option 2, I'll add a note to the view transitions spec. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jakearchibald Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8139#issuecomment-1423941690 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2023 10:14:14 UTC