- From: Michał Gołębiowski-Owczarek via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2023 22:12:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@Loirooriol yes but then you need to precisely identify which parts you consider problematic; this can be hard e.g. if what you pass to `:has()` is dynamic. In any case, the wording: > wrapping a style rule’s selector in `:is()` effectively "upgrades" it to become forgiving suggests wrapping the whole selector part you're interested it, at least that's how I read it. -- GitHub Notification of comment by mgol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8430#issuecomment-1423308750 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2023 22:12:40 UTC